Article Summary
Dr. Vinay Prasad, a critic of the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA, has been appointed to oversee the health agency’s program for vaccines and biotech drugs. This appointment raises concerns about unnecessary scrutiny for vaccines and other new therapies. Prasad has previously suggested that Americans would be better off without the FDA in its current form. He has been a critic of the FDA’s fast-tracking of cancer drugs and of mask mandates, lockdowns, and vaccine boosters during the COVID-19 pandemic.
What This Means for You
- Be aware of potential new obstacles for vaccine and biotech drug approvals under Prasad’s leadership.
- Expect a continuation of anti-FDA and anti-lockdown rhetoric from the health agency’s vaccine and biotech office.
- Stay informed about changes or delays in the regulatory review process for vaccines and biotech drugs.
- Brace for heightened skepticism and scrutiny of COVID-19 vaccine booster shots, particularly for young people.
- Consider the potential impact of this appointment on the pharmaceutical industry and the development timelines for new treatments.
Original Post
WASHINGTON — Dr. Vinay Prasad, a prominent critic of the pharmaceutical industry and the Food and Drug Administration, has been named to oversee the health agency’s program for vaccines and biotech drugs.
FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary announced the appointment Tuesday in a message to agency staff, praising Prasad’s “long and distinguished history in medicine.”
Prasad is the latest in a series of medical contrarians and critics of COVID-19 measures to join the federal government under President Donald Trump.
Unlike political roles such as FDA commissioner, the job Prasad is stepping into has traditionally been held by an FDA career scientist. His appointment raises new questions about whether vaccines and other new therapies will face unnecessary scrutiny from regulators.
Prasad replaces Dr. Peter Marks, FDA’s longtime vaccine chief who resigned in March after clashing with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over concerns about the safety of vaccinations.
In a social media post, Prasad likened Marks to “a bobblehead doll that just stamps approval.”
Last year, he told former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy that Americans would probably be better off without the FDA in its current form.
A professor at the University of California San Francisco, Prasad’s medical training is in cancer and blood disorders. He first came to prominence among academics for a series of papers scrutinizing the evidence behind new cancer therapies.
Research by Prasad and his colleagues showed that many cancer drugs fast-tracked by the FDA have never been shown to improve or extend patient lives. Instead, the drugs are often approved based on alternate measures, such as the ability to shrink tumors, which are thought to predict their long-term benefits.
The FDA has long defended this practice as a way of accelerating approval of medicines for desperately ill patients.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Prasad reached a much broader audience as a critic of mask mandates, lockdowns and moves to speed the availability of vaccine boosters from Pfizer and Moderna. Many of his views mirror those of other Trump appointees, including Makary and National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya.
In 2022, Prasad and Makary were co-authors on a paper attacking the recommendation for booster shots in teens and young adults, particularly boys and young men. Those patients received particular attention because early vaccinations showed a higher rate of myocarditis, a rare form of heart inflammation that is usually mild.
The paper concluded that requiring booster shots in young people would cause more injury than
Key Terms
- Vaccines
- FDA
- Criticism
- Cancer therapies
- Regulation
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link