Article Summary
Linda Greenhouse asks whether newspapers should name the President who appointed a federal judge when reporting on a decision. Greenhouse, who previously opposed the practice, now views it as essential for democracy. This article shares a differing view, arguing that courts have always been political to some degree and that it’s disingenuous to suggest otherwise. The author argues that the shift in Greenhouse’s opinion is motivated by her political views and that it’s important to acknowledge the political nature of the judiciary, especially when single judges impose their views on the country.
What This Means for You
- Understanding the political nature of the judiciary is essential for a well-informed public.
- It’s important to be critical of journalistic practices and to consider the motivations behind them.
- The trend of naming the President who appointed a judge when reporting on a decision could have implications for how the judiciary is perceived and how decisions are made.
- The future outlook for the judiciary and its relationship to politics is uncertain, but it’s important to stay informed and critical.
Original Post
Linda Greenhouse took to the New York Times to ask whether newspapers should name the President who appointed a federal judge to the bench when reporting on a decision. This trend has grown in journalism and been criticized by some.
Greenhouse’s own view has evolved: back in the day when the federal judiciary was reliably the liberals’ last resort, she opposed it. Now, however, “when only the federal courts stand between democracy and autocracy, it provides essential reassurance that the rule of law is not a partisan project.”
The article argues that Greenhouse’s change of opinion is motivated by her political views and that it’s disingenuous to suggest that the courts have not always been political to some degree.
The author argues that the author of an opinion should not be identified by who appointed them, as it undermines the legitimacy of the court.
The article concludes by acknowledging the importance of understanding the political nature of the judiciary, especially when single judges impose their views on the country, and encourages readers to stay informed and critical.
Key Terms
- Judicial Politics
- Federal Judiciary
- Journalistic Practices
- Judicial Legitimacy
- Politicized Courts
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
