Article Summary
A legal dispute is ongoing between Texas Capital Bank (TCB) and Ginnie Mae over the extinguishment of TCB’s first-priority lien on collateral related to the HECM program. Ginnie Mae sought a summary judgment in January, arguing that it acted within its lawful authority. Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled in favor of Ginnie Mae, stating that Congress granted extinguishment power over mortgages. TCB has vowed to appeal the decision, expressing concerns about the government’s unlawful seizure of collateral and its impact on the reverse mortgage industry.
What This Means for You
- Be aware of the legal dispute between TCB and Ginnie Mae, which could have implications for the reverse mortgage industry.
- Understand the potential risks and consequences of participating in government programs like the HECM, as unlawful seizure of collateral could affect industry players.
- Stay informed about the progression of the lawsuit and its potential effects on the reverse mortgage market, especially if you are a stakeholder or an industry participant.
- Consider the potential chilling effect on the industry due to this legal battle, which might influence the willingness of banks to participate in similar programs.
Original Post
The bank alleged that Ginnie Mae had “extinguished, in return for no consideration, TCB’s first priority lien on tens of millions of dollars in collateral stemming from the HECM program.”
Ginnie Mae sought a summary judgment through a filing in January. It said that the court had “ruled on the merits that GNMA acted within its lawful authority when it extinguished the mortgage interests of Reverse Mortgage Funding (RMF).”
Because of that, Ginnie Mae argued that TCB “no longer has any remaining rights or interests in the property at issue in this case.” This stemmed from an October 2024 decision by Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in which TCB alleged that Ginnie Mae violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) by extinguishing its first-priority liens over certain reverse mortgage collateral.
Kacsmaryk disagreed, saying then that Ginnie Mae “was within its rights to extinguish and terminate RMF and take absolute ownership of [the] mortgage portfolio.”
In April, the judge ruled summarily in favor of the government. He wrote that Congress had granted “extinguishment power over mortgages” and that it “did not write ‘participations that constitute the trust or pool.’ Nor did it write ‘property that constitutes the trust or pool.’ It chose mortgages. And so that is the relevant unit GNMA holds extinguishment power over.”
Following the decision, TCB vowed to appeal. When reached on Tuesday, representatives for the bank reaffirmed their original stance after filing the appeal on Monday.
“Texas Capital disagrees with the judge’s ruling and is now appealing,” the bank said in a statement submitted to RMD. “The entire industry should be alarmed at this ruling and the government’s unlawful seizure of collateral. The victims of Ginnie Mae’s unlawful action will be the seniors who rely on the reverse mortgage program to pay basic expenses.”
The bank went on to say that if Ginnie Mae’s actions are allowed to stand, “it will have consequences far beyond this case, most seriously, the chilling effect on the industry, including the ability and willingness of Texas Capital and others to participate in programs like this one.”
Key Terms
- HECM Program
- Ginnie Mae
- Reverse Mortgage Funding
- Extinguishment Power
- Administrative Procedures Act (APA)
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
Automatic Mortgage Calculator
Welcome to our Automatic Mortgage Calculator 4idiotz! Please just add your figures in the correct sections below and the Automatic Mortgage Calculator will automatically calculate the results for you and display them at the bottom of the page.
