CryptoCurrency

Republican Lawmaker Votes NO On GENIUS Act Over Missing CBDC Ban – Details

Summary:

In a surprising turn of events during “Crypto Week,” the US House of Representatives voted against the GENIUS Act, a bill aimed at establishing clearer regulatory guidelines for stablecoins. Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene opposed the bill due to its failure to include a ban on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), citing concerns over financial privacy and government overreach.

What This Means for You:

  • Monitor the ongoing debate around CBDCs and their potential impact on financial privacy and government control.
  • Stay informed about stablecoin regulation, as changes could affect your crypto investments and market stability.
  • Prepare for potential market volatility as crypto policy debates continue to unfold in Congress.
  • Consider the long-term implications of CBDCs on financial sovereignty and individual freedoms.

Republican Lawmaker Votes NO On GENIUS Act Over Missing CBDC Ban – Details:

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In a surprising turn of events during the highly anticipated “Crypto Week,” the US House of Representatives voted against the GENIUS Act yesterday, despite widespread expectations that it would pass alongside two other crypto-related bills. The decision sent ripples through the crypto market, catching many investors and industry participants off guard, as the GENIUS Act was seen as a key step toward establishing clearer regulatory guidelines for stablecoins.

One of the most vocal opponents of the bill was US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who represents Georgia’s 14th District and currently serves as Chairwoman of the DOGE Committee. In a statement following the vote, Greene explained that her opposition stemmed from the bill’s failure to include a ban on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). She emphasized that Americans do not want a government-controlled digital dollar and that Republicans have a duty to defend financial freedom and privacy by opposing CBDCs.

The unexpected rejection of the GENIUS Act raises new questions about the direction of crypto regulation in the United States and highlights the growing divide over CBDC policy. As lawmakers continue to debate the future of digital finance, the spotlight now turns to how Congress will proceed.

CBDC Debate Ignites As Trump Asserts GENIUS Act Vote Will Pass

US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene also criticized Speaker Mike Johnson for not allowing members of Congress to submit amendments to the legislation.

“Americans do not want a government-controlled Central Bank Digital Currency,” Greene declared. “Republicans have a duty to ban CBDC.” She pointed to former President Donald Trump’s executive order from January 23, which explicitly called for a CBDC ban, arguing that Congress should reflect that position within the GENIUS Act.

The dispute over CBDCs has now emerged as a key dividing line within the broader crypto policy debate. For critics like Greene, a CBDC represents government overreach and a direct threat to individual financial privacy, concerns that have gained traction among conservatives.

Despite the failed vote, US President Donald Trump struck an optimistic tone on his Truth Social account, signaling that the legislative push is far from over. “I am in the Oval Office with 11 of the 12 Congressmen/women necessary to pass the GENIUS Act and, after a short discussion, they have all agreed to vote tomorrow morning in favor of the Rule,” he wrote.

US President Statement on Truth Social
US President Statement on Truth Social | Source: US President Donald Trump

If Wednesday’s vote succeeds, it could breathe new life into the GENIUS Act and reframe the discussion around crypto regulation. However, the growing insistence on a CBDC ban may continue to complicate bipartisan support, especially as the issue becomes more deeply entangled in the 2024 presidential race and the future of financial sovereignty in the US

Stablecoin Dominance Drops To 7.08% As Risk Appetite Rises

The weekly chart of stablecoin dominance shows a clear downward shift, with the metric currently sitting at 7.08%, marking a steady decline from its recent highs above 9%. This trend suggests that capital is rotating out of stablecoins and into more volatile crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, a common pattern during periods of renewed market confidence.

Stablecoin Dominance declines | Source: STABLE.D chart on TradingView
Stablecoin Dominance declines | Source: STABLE.D chart on TradingView

Stablecoin dominance is now trading below all key moving averages: the 50-week (7.72%), 100-week (7.97%), and 200-week (9.31%) SMAs. This technical breakdown highlights a weakening position for stablecoins relative to the broader crypto market. Historically, when dominance falls below these levels, it signals growing risk appetite and a shift toward the accumulation of growth assets, which aligns with current bullish momentum across altcoins and ETH.

This decline in dominance—despite total stablecoin supply continuing to rise—is a bullish macro signal. It shows that liquidity is present and moving into the market, not out of it, supporting the case for further upside in the months ahead.

Featured image from Dall-E, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Extra Information:

For more insights on the GENIUS Act, explore this article. To understand the broader implications of CBDCs, check out the Federal Reserve’s stance on CBDCs.

People Also Ask About:

  • What is the GENIUS Act? A legislative bill aimed at regulating stablecoins in the U.S.
  • Why was the GENIUS Act rejected? It lacked a ban on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
  • What are the risks of CBDCs? Potential threats to financial privacy and government overreach.
  • How does stablecoin dominance affect the crypto market? Declining dominance often signals increased risk appetite.
  • What is the future of crypto regulation in the U.S.? Uncertain, with ongoing debates over CBDCs and stablecoins.

Expert Opinion:

The rejection of the GENIUS Act underscores the contentious nature of CBDC policy in the U.S. and highlights the need for bipartisan solutions that address both innovation and privacy concerns in digital finance.

Key Terms:



ORIGINAL SOURCE:

Source link

Search the Web