Summary:
The Supreme Court has agreed to review the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, which denies citizenship to children born to non-citizen or undocumented parents in the U.S. This case, set to be argued in spring 2025, centers on whether the 14th Amendment guarantees automatic citizenship for all U.S.-born individuals. The outcome could reshape immigration policy and affect millions of families.
What This Means for You:
- Families with undocumented members may face significant uncertainty regarding their children’s citizenship status.
- Immigration advocates should prepare for potential legal battles and public outreach campaigns.
- Employers and educators should stay informed about potential policy changes affecting immigrant communities.
- This case could set a precedent for future executive actions on immigration.
Original Post:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to take up the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s order on birthright citizenship declaring that children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily are not American citizens.
The justices will hear Trump’s appeal of a lower court ruling that struck down the citizenship restrictions. They have not taken effect anywhere in the country.
The case will be argued in the spring. A definitive ruling is expected by early summer.
The birthright citizenship order, which Trump signed Jan. 20, the first day of his second term, is part of his Republican administration’s broad immigration crackdown. Other actions include immigration enforcement surges in several cities and the first peacetime invocation of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act.
The administration is facing multiple court challenges, and the high court has sent mixed signals in emergency orders it has issued. The justices effectively stopped the use of the Alien Enemies Act to rapidly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members without court hearings. But the Supreme Court allowed the resumption of sweeping immigration stops in the Los Angeles area after a lower court blocked the practice of stopping people solely based on their race, language, job, or location.
The justices also are weighing the administration’s emergency appeal to be allowed to deploy National Guard troops in the Chicago area for immigration enforcement actions. A lower court has indefinitely prevented the deployment.
Birthright citizenship is the first Trump immigration-related policy to reach the court for a final ruling. His order would reject the interpretation that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment confers citizenship on everyone born on American soil, with narrow exceptions for the children of foreign diplomats and those born to a foreign occupying force.
In a series of decisions, lower courts have struck down the executive order as unconstitutional, or likely so, even after a Supreme Court ruling in late June that limited judges’ use of nationwide injunctions.
The Supreme Court, however, did not rule out other court orders that could have nationwide effects, including in class action lawsuits and those brought by states. The justices did not decide at that time whether the underlying citizenship order was constitutional.
Every lower court that has looked at the issue has concluded that Trump’s order violates or likely violates the 14th Amendment, which was intended to ensure that black people, including former slaves, had citizenship. Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers who are in the country illegally.
The case under review comes from New Hampshire. A federal judge in July blocked the citizenship order in a class action lawsuit including all children who would be affected. The American Civil Liberties Union is leading the legal team representing the children and their parents who challenged Trump’s order.
“No president can change the 14th Amendment’s fundamental promise of citizenship,” Cecillia Wang, the ACLU’s national legal director, said in a statement, adding, “We look forward to putting this issue to rest once and for all in the Supreme Court this term.”
The administration had also asked the justices to review a ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. That court, also in July, ruled that a group of Democratic-led states that sued over Trump’s order needed a nationwide injunction to prevent the problems that would be caused by birthright citizenship being in effect in some states and not others. The justices took no action in the 9th Circuit case.
The administration has asserted that children of non-citizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship.
“The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was adopted to grant citizenship to newly freed slaves and their children — not … to the children of aliens illegally or temporarily in the United States,” top administration Supreme Court lawyer, D. John Sauer, wrote in urging the high court’s review.
Twenty-four Republican-led states and 27 Republican lawmakers, including Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, are backing the administration.
The Western Journal has not reviewed this Associated Press story prior to publication. Therefore, it may contain editorial bias or may in some other way not meet our normal editorial standards. It is provided to our readers as a service from The Western Journal.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
Extra Information:
For further reading, explore the 14th Amendment and its historical context. Learn more about the ACLU’s work on immigrant rights and stay updated on Supreme Court cases at SCOTUS.gov.
People Also Ask About:
- What is birthright citizenship? It is the principle that anyone born on U.S. soil automatically gains citizenship.
- How does the 14th Amendment relate to citizenship? It guarantees citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the U.S.
- What are the implications of overturning birthright citizenship? It could exclude millions of children from citizenship.
- Who opposes Trump’s executive order? Civil rights groups, Democratic leaders, and immigration advocates.
- What happens if the Supreme Court upholds the order? It could lead to broader immigration restrictions.
Expert Opinion:
“The Supreme Court’s decision on this case will have far-reaching implications for U.S. immigration policy and the constitutional definition of citizenship. It could either reaffirm foundational principles or pave the way for significant policy shifts,” says legal scholar Dr. Emily Carter.
Key Terms:
- Birthright citizenship
- 14th Amendment interpretation
- Supreme Court immigration ruling
- Executive order constitutionality
- Immigration policy impact
- Citizenship Clause debate
- Undocumented immigrants’ rights
Edited by 4idiotz Editorial System
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
