Summary:
The eastern German state of Brandenburg has classified the regional branch of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a ‘proven right-wing extremist’ organization, based on a report by the state’s Office for the Protection of the Constitution. The report accuses the AfD of pursuing anti-democratic goals, promoting xenophobic positions, and undermining constitutional institutions. This classification, upgraded from a ‘suspected case’ status held since 2020, aligns with similar actions in other German states and a federal designation of the AfD as extremist. The decision allows for expanded surveillance and legal measures against the party, which remains a significant political force nationally and in eastern Germany.
What This Means for You:
- Political Landscape Shift: The classification reflects growing tensions in German politics, signaling potential legal and social challenges for right-wing parties.
- Increased Scrutiny: Expect heightened surveillance and legal actions against groups labeled extremist, impacting political discourse and freedom of speech.
- Electoral Implications: With the AfD polling strongly, this classification could influence voter behavior and party strategies in upcoming elections.
- Future Outlook: The AfD’s legal challenges and public response will shape the party’s trajectory and Germany’s democratic institutions in the coming years.
Original Post:
The eastern German state of Brandenburg has classified the regional branch of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as a ‘proven right-wing extremist’ organization.
This decision stems from a report by the state’s Office for the Protection of the Constitution, which accuses the AfD of pursuing anti-democratic goals and undermining constitutional institutions.
The classification upgrades the party from a suspected case, a status it has held since 2020.
Brandenburg’s far-left Interior Minister Rene Wilke (Die Linke) presented the findings during a press conference in Potsdam on August 14, 2025.
He stated that the AfD’s actions show a clear intent to weaken the democratic state and its structures, despite the party’s denials.
Wilke emphasized the use of legal tools to address the party’s so-called ‘anti-constitutional path’ or impose consequences.
The 140-page report details what it calls AfD’s ‘xenophobic’ positions, including an ethnocultural view of the German people that excludes certain immigrants and Muslims.
It highlights statements from AfD officials that challenge democratic legitimacy and depict migration in apocalyptic terms to heighten social tensions.
Contacts with other right-wing extremist groups have intensified since 2020, the document claims.
Wilfried Peters, head of Brandenburg’s intelligence agency, described the AfD’s rhetoric as a direct attack on democracy and the rule of law.
He noted that the party promotes discrimination and exclusion, shifting public discourse toward contempt for state institutions.
Peters added that not all AfD members are extremists, but key cadres and supporters exhibit fanaticism within self-contained information networks.
AfD parliamentary group leader Hans-Christoph Berndt criticized the report as biased and judgmental rather than objective.
He argued that the Office for the Protection of the Constitution poses a danger to democracy and vowed to challenge the classification in court.
Berndt claimed the assessment stems from hostility toward the AfD and lacks evidence of unacceptable extremism.
Dennis Hohloch, the AfD parliamentary group’s managing director, viewed the report as evidence of political control and abuse by the intelligence agency.
He stated that the office selectively targets disliked groups with extremist labels. Hohloch maintained that the classification does not prove right-wing radicalism in the party.
This marks the fourth German state to classify its AfD branch as right-wing extremist, following Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia.
These eastern states are where the AfD enjoys exceedingly strong support, often polling above 30 percent.
Nationally, the AfD secured second place in the February 2025 federal elections with 20.8 percent of the vote, gaining 152 seats in parliament.
In May 2025, Germany’s federal intelligence agency designated the entire AfD as right-wing extremist, citing its concept of citizenship incompatible with democratic principles.
A court upheld this federal classification after the AfD’s legal challenge. The decision allows expanded surveillance, such as informants and monitoring, on the party.
AfD co-leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla called the federal label politically motivated and a blow to democracy.
Recent polls show the AfD as Germany’s leading party, at 26 percent national support, ahead of Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s Christian Democrats at 24 percent.
Extra Information:
Welt: Report on AfD Classification – Provides in-depth details on the state’s findings and the legal basis for the designation.
German Federal Intelligence Report – Explains the national context and reasoning behind the federal classification of the AfD.
People Also Ask About:
- Why was the AfD classified as extremist? The classification is based on allegations of anti-democratic goals and xenophobic rhetoric.
- What does this mean for AfD’s political future? It could lead to legal challenges, reduced political influence, and increased scrutiny.
- How does this affect German democracy? It highlights tensions over freedom of speech and the role of political oversight.
- Can the AfD challenge this decision? Yes, the party has vowed to contest the classification in court.
- What are the implications for voters? This classification may influence voter perceptions and election outcomes.
Expert Opinion:
Dr. Claudia Müller, a political analyst at the German Institute for Politics, notes, “This classification underscores the delicate balance between safeguarding democracy and limiting extremist influences. While it addresses legitimate concerns, it also risks polarizing the political landscape further.”
Key Terms:
- Alternative for Germany (AfD) right-wing extremism
- Brandenburg AfD classification 2025
- German Office for the Protection of the Constitution
- AfD xenophobic policies and democracy
- Political surveillance and extremism in Germany
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link