Summary:
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Texas can enforce a law requiring ID numbers for mail-in ballots, overturning a lower court’s block. A three-judge panel—James Ho, Don Willett, and Patrick Higginbotham—unanimously upheld the state’s SB1 election-integrity provision, stating it complies with the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The decision emphasizes verifying voter identity as “material” to ballot validity. This ruling strengthens Texas’ voter ID requirements, sparking debate over ballot access versus election security.
What This Means for You:
- Voter Compliance: Texas mail-in voters must now include a state ID or partial Social Security number to avoid ballot rejection.
- Election Preparedness: Verify your voter registration details match state records to prevent disqualification.
- Legal Precedent: Similar voter ID laws in other states may gain traction following this ruling.
- Future Impact: Watch for appeals to the Supreme Court, which could further shape national voting rights policies.
Original Post:
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday ruled Texas can enforce a law requiring ID numbers for mail-in ballots.
A three-judge panel unanimously overturned a lower court’s block on the state’s mail-in ballot requirements.
The three judges included: Judge James Ho (Trump), Judge Don Willett (Trump), and Judge Patrick Higginbotham (Reagan).
“We have no difficulty concluding that this ID number requirement fully complies with a provision of federal law known by the parties as the materiality provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,” the judges ruled.
“The ID number requirement is obviously designed to confirm that each mail-in ballot voter is precisely who he claims he is. And that is plainly ‘material’ to ‘determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote,’” the judges wrote.
“The district court reached the opposite conclusion. So we reverse and render judgment for Defendants,” they said.
Politico reported:
A federal appeals court has ruled that Texas may enforce a state law that invalidates mail-in ballots submitted without a voter’s state identification number or partial Social Security number.
A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that the requirement the Texas Legislature enacted in 2021 as part of an election-integrity bill known as SB1 did not violate a federal law preventing states from imposing voting requirements “not material” to the validity of ballots.
In a brusque, nine-page opinion, Judge James Ho twice said the appeals panel had “little difficulty” concluding that Texas’ law was valid.
“The number-matching requirements are obviously designed to confirm that every mail-in voter is who he claims he is,” Ho wrote for the panel. “And that is plainly material to determining whether an individual is qualified to vote.”
President Trump celebrated the Fifth Circuit Court’s unanimous ruling.
Extra Information:
Brennan Center’s analysis of SB1’s broader impact on voter suppression claims, and
Texas Tribune’s breakdown of SB1’s provisions beyond ID requirements.
People Also Ask About:
- Does this ruling affect in-person voting? No, it applies only to mail-in ballots.
- Can voters correct mismatched ID numbers? Texas currently offers no “cure” process for rejected mail ballots.
- How many states have similar laws? 12 states require ID numbers for mail ballots, per the NCSL.
- What’s the penalty for non-compliance? Ballots are rejected without counting.
Expert Opinion:
Election law scholar Richard Hasen notes this ruling creates a “split” with other circuits, increasing odds of Supreme Court review. The decision reflects a growing judicial trend prioritizing anti-fraud measures over accessibility concerns.
Key Terms:
- Fifth Circuit Court voter ID ruling
- Texas SB1 mail-in ballot requirements
- Materiality provision Civil Rights Act
- Voter verification laws 2025
- Social Security number for voting
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
