Article Summary
The article discusses the shift in gun ownership sentiment among leftists, highlighting the recent New York Times article titled “My Husband Fears Political Violence. Should We Buy a Gun?” The article also emphasizes the importance of language in shaping perception and influencing the debate around gun rights, suggesting that human rights terminology should be used instead of gun rights.
What This Means for You
- Be aware of the changing attitudes towards gun ownership among different political groups. This knowledge can help you better understand and navigate the complexities of the gun control debate.
- Recognize the power of language in shaping public opinion, and pay attention to the words used by different parties in the debate. Using human rights terminology instead of gun rights can help advance the cause of commonsense gun ownership.
- Stay informed about current trends and examples that demonstrate the growing acceptance of gun ownership among various demographics. Such information can strengthen your arguments and support the case for gun rights.
- Be prepared for potential future developments in the gun control landscape, including increased attempts at selective enforcement and the selective denial of gun ownership to political opponents.
Original Post
It’s always a mistake to forget that word usage sets the rhetorical battlefield and restricts our thoughts. Far too many on the freedom side of the fence tend to use the “pro-gun/anti-gun” formulation, or even worse, couch the constitutional contest over our commonsense human right as one of inanimate objects.
Such mistakes neglect the fact that leftists love guns. They just don’t want them in our hands; that’s why there has been a sea change in their control schemes from outright bans to selective persecution.
But now that the winds of change favor the pro-freedom side of the political spectrum, leftists have suddenly started arming up for who knows what, and we have several stunning examples to prove the point.
A recent video from Langley Outdoors Academy gives us a quick rundown on something we thought we would never see from the gun-grabbing ghouls of the left.
The first example, from the New York Times magazine, is a piece most patriots on the pro-freedom side of the fence thought they would never see. Most telling is that the article includes an illustration that would be at home in any “prepper” publication — three “break glass in case of emergency” boxes with first aid in one, a fire extinguisher in another, and the outline of a gun in the third. That’s a pretty bold statement, which goes along with our contention that a firearm is just another piece of emergency equipment. The piece is entitled “My Husband Fears Political Violence. Should We Buy a Gun?”
My husband and I are Democrats, and we live in a large left-leaning city. Considering the current political climate in the United States and deepening concerns that it will only get worse, my husband wants to purchase a gun for safety reasons. To be clear, we don’t have general safety concerns. We live in the heart of the city, and I feel safe. He is concerned about political or ideologically motivated violence. …
I think guns are evil, and I believe that the world would be a better place without weapons. But I would hate to regret not having a gun if things get so chaotic that people need to protect themselves. Should I go against my own beliefs because of a possible future
… [continued in the following response]
Key Terms:
- Gun ownership
- Gun control
- Language in gun debate
- Selective enforcement
- Human rights terminology
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
