Summary:
The article examines why ABC reinstated Jimmy Kimmel despite declining ratings and controversial remarks. It suggests that ABC prioritizes political alignment and liberal agendas over profitability, alienating conservative and Christian audiences. This decision raises questions about the network’s funding sources and its commitment to objectivity.
What This Means for You:
- Media Bias Awareness: Recognize the potential for political bias in mainstream media and seek diverse sources for balanced perspectives.
- Consumer Influence: Consider supporting media outlets that align with your values or abstain from those that don’t.
- Advertising Impact: Be mindful of where advertising dollars go and how they fund specific agendas.
- Future Outlook: Expect continued polarization in media as networks prioritize ideological alignment over neutrality.
Original Post:
When you’re wondering why on Earth a person or an organization would make a seemingly ill-considered and thoroughly self-defeating decision, it’s always wise to follow the money.
So, ask yourself: Why would ABC, after suspending the strident, unfunny blackface afficionado Jimmy Kimmel for his despicable comments regarding Charlie Kirk and his memorial service, suddenly decide to put Kimmel back on the air?
Was Kimmel’s late-night show attracting new viewers, absolutely soaring in the ratings, and threatening FOX’s Greg Gutfeld? No.
Just the opposite. Much like his idiot, ideological stepbrother Stephen Colbert, Kimmel’s ratings were cratering year after year at an alarming pace. It’s also reasonable to surmise that like Colbert — now a dead man walking — Jimmy Lib was losing millions of dollars annually for ABC. So they certainly didn’t bring Kimmel’s show back because it showed, or will show, a substantial profit.
What message, then, can the average American take away from ABC’s actions?
Well, what is ABC, other than a media mouthpiece for Democrats and loony liberals? The network routinely smears Republicans and conservatives, and daily likens Presidential Trump to some combination of Hitler, Stalin, and Beelzebub. The folks at ABC wouldn’t recognize objectivity if it bit them in the personal pronouns.
Hence, they don’t care a whit what Republicans think about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk.
They’re not worried that Christians everywhere are crushed by the horrific murder of a man of faith, and furious at Jimmy Kimmel’s hateful remarks.
By reinstating Kimmel, ABC clearly signals to all of Donald Trump’s supporters that they don’t matter.
ABC brazenly giving the middle finger to Republicans, Christians, and MAGA members tells us that their advertising money really isn’t needed to support the otherwise failing network.
So how is ABC paying the bills? Who is surreptitiously funding the hateful, corrupt provider of left-wing propaganda that is ABC?
Got to be Democrats, no?
Prove me wrong.
Pixabay” src=”https://images.americanthinker.com/tb/tb6cspu73bjbdwh50lt5_640.JPG” width=”500″ />
Image: Pixabay
Extra Information:
For further reading on media bias and its implications, explore these resources:
People Also Ask About:
- Why did ABC reinstate Jimmy Kimmel? ABC likely prioritized its political alignment over profitability or audience approval.
- How does media bias influence public opinion? Media bias can shape narratives and reinforce ideological divisions.
- What are the financial implications of declining TV ratings? Declining ratings can lead to reduced advertising revenue and financial losses.
- Who funds major media networks? Networks are funded through advertising, sponsorships, and potentially ideological donors.
Expert Opinion:
Media decisions like ABC’s reinstatement of Jimmy Kimmel underscore the growing prioritization of ideological alignment over neutrality and profitability, signaling a shift toward more polarized content that risks alienating diverse audiences.
Key Terms:
- media bias in mainstream networks
- political alignment in television
- impact of declining TV ratings
- funding sources for media outlets
- polarization in mainstream media
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
