Article Summary
Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith VC, MG, the most highly decorated soldier in the Commonwealth, is engaged in a legal battle regarding a defamation case against McKenzie and Nine newspapers. Despite presenting substantial evidence, the court deemed his evidence inadmissible, raising questions about justice affordability and accessibility in the country. Roberts-Smith has become a symbol of the growing discontent among common-sense Australians who see the case as emblematic of the erosion of justice in the country.
What This Means for You
- This case highlights the escalating costs of pursuing justice in Australia, making it inaccessible for ordinary citizens.
- The Roberts-Smith defamation case is indicative of the plight faced by many Australians seeking fair treatment, which may ultimately lead to public unrest and demands for change.
- Stay informed to make educated decisions about supporting candidates and parties that prioritize justice reform.
- Future outlook: The outcome of this case is crucial in setting a precedent for access to justice in the country.
Original Post
Roberts-Smith argues his unsuccessful defamation case against McKenzie and Nine newspapers should be retried because of a ‘miscarriage of justice’ while Nine has been caught out bribing a witness with $700,000
By Dr Dan Mealey
Last week, Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith VC, MG once again appeared before the Federal Court armed with a staggering amount of evidence against the credibility of his detractors. And once again that evidence was deemed inadmissible by the Court, for reasons that continue to perplex Australians who value truth and justice.
“Justice” — once considered to be a fundamental human right — is now a distant foggy memory in a country that now charges fifty million dollars to approximate it. Formerly in the toolkit of wise and upright adjudicators to enact it, the concept of “justice” has been bastardised into a commodity that seemingly only millionaires can afford.
It’s no secret that Ben Roberts-Smith is no millionaire, and that his legal costs are being funded, under loan, by the CEO of Seven Group Holdings Ltd, Kerry Stokes AC. It’s also no secret that despite being the Commonwealth’s most highly decorated soldier, Roberts-Smith held the lowly rank of ‘Corporal,’ now pitted against Goliath-like attacks upon him. Consequently, this is stirring the sympathetic rage of a growing population of disempowered Australians for whom “justice” has for decades, been inaccessible.
Putting aside the extraordinary injustices of tens of thousands of Australian veterans that led Roberts-Smith to influence a major Royal Commission to investigate them, civilian Australians have been equally brutalised in a country in which “justice” has simply become too expensive.
A note to our lofty Members of Parliament increasingly disconnected from their electorate: those Australians are now angry, and the case of Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith versus a billionaire empire of political, Defence and media giants is emblematic of the plight of a growing army of common-sense Australians calling “bull shit” on the insane proposition that Ben Roberts-Smith was ever a war criminal.
Key Terms
- Defamation case
- Ben Roberts-Smith
- Nine newspapers
- Federal Court
- Justice affordability
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
