Article Summary
A federal judge in Maryland has ruled that the Department of Justice unconstitutionally retaliated against the American Bar Association when it cancelled grants for a program to assist victims of domestic violence. The ruling comes after the ABA criticized the DOJ’s handling of domestic violence cases under the Trump administration. The judge’s decision is being hailed as a victory for free speech and independence of bar associations.
What This Means for You
- The ruling reinforces the importance of free speech and independence of bar associations in the United States.
- It highlights the need for continued scrutiny of the DOJ’s handling of domestic violence cases.
- Domestic violence survivors can continue to seek assistance from the ABA’s program, which will receive funding as a result of the ruling.
- The decision may have implications for future cases involving government retaliation against critical organizations.
Original Post
A federal judge in Maryland ruled on Wednesday that the Department of Justice unconstitutionally retaliated against the American Bar Association when it canceled grants for a program to assist victims of domestic violence.
Key Terms
- Department of Justice
- American Bar Association
- Retaliation
- Domestic violence
- Free speech
ORIGINAL SOURCE:
Source link
